Asylum: 20th Century Case Studies
In 1911 the International Women's Day (IWD) was first established in Austria and, with the exception of the two world wars and Austrofacism, it has been honoured yearly ever since. Like sunbeams concentrating in the focal point of a magnifying lens, the celebration of the IWD bundles the changing demands of women and gender politics through time. Despite the long continuity of the Women's Day, it is remarkable how little is known about its emergence, its respective activists and organizations as well as its celebrations within party political contexts (mostly socialist) and beyond. Profound research is still in need to close the scientific knowledge gap on national and international levels. This lack of knowledge is astonishing for several reasons: Firstly, the International Women's Day was and still is a public festive day with (varying) presence in the media. The yearly celebration was and continues to be an occasion for the mobilization and political organization of women. Thus, the IWD plays a crucial role in establishing ‘women' as political agents. Secondly, we are interested in the different concepts on women and gender politics advocated by activists and special interest groups. Thirdly, celebrations demonstrate international connections and transfer of ideas and politics. Ultimately, the International Women's Day is a unique possibility to analyze booms and shifts of feminist positions. Our research will enable us to fill the scientific knowledge gap mentioned above. The project results will be published separately. Furthermore, we will arrange an exhibition in 2011. Project management: Maria Mesner The aim of the project is to provide archival material on women's politics in Austria adapted to online-media exigencies. Unpublished holdings covering the last three decades of women's politics are made digitally accessible, a commented selection is put online. The most crucial issues are abortion conflict, debate and information on the wage gap, family law reform, domestic violence and equal sharing of care work among others. They will be presented and made intelligible more clearly than in traditional social science presentation with authentic documents, pictures, posters, and pamphlets. Historical narratives will provide additional information and context. Visitors of the knowledge base will be able to download various items in order to use them for own activities: as teachers, students or just for their own education. Thus, we hope to establish and support a new transfer of knowledge and material between archives and people interested in the past.
The project deals with the development of family law in Austria, Slovakia, the Czech Republic and their respective predecessor states during the period from 1945 to 2000 in a comparative perspective. The study focuses on the interactions between public discourse and the establishment of legal norms, whereby the following aspects are crucial: we are interested in the political actors involved in the public discussion and the legislative process. We focus both on the various actors' mode of organization and on their strategies for structuring policies. Furthermore, we are interested in the extent to which political interest groups are able to influence political deliberations and law making. At the same time, the significance of political framework conditions for the possibility of participation in public debate and in the structuring of the development of law will be elucidated. The comparison of states with different political systems and forms of society forestalls the danger of universalizing the research results. The project analyses the concepts of family and society advocated by special interest groups and reflected in codified family norms in a historical longitudinal study.
Paul Pasteur is a professor of history at the University of Rouen and co-editor of the journal Austriaca. In his book Pasteur examines Austrian trade unions during the Austrofascist period. After having been illegalized by the authoritarian corporatist regime Socialdemocratic, Communist as well as Nationalsocialist labor organizations were forced to go into hiding. In hard competition to each other they established company organizations, in order to win over the employees, while the Austrofascists required all workers to join the Christian corporatist organizations. Paul Pasteur describes these strongly differing groups with particular focus on their fields of conflict. Whereas most studies limit their attention to one ideological group, Pasteur includes all kinds of weltanschauungen. To date there is no similar historical analysis covering Austrian trade unions in such a broad perspective.
|